[randomhero97]

Well, I’ll take it and go with it. I’ll definitely post up pics. I don’t have any ink on me right now but have been debating for years. They’re so damn expensive to get a decent size.

[Travis McGee]

I am 51 and tat-free and intend to stay that way. I guess it’s a generational shift thing.

[Charles Martel]

I've nothing against tats; but every time I considered getting one, it always seemed like some other expense popped up. I'm a few year younger than you, Travis, but you're right about it being a "generational" priority. Me, I was always saving up for a car, hotrod parts for said car, or gun stuff.

And speaking of gun stuff, might it not be better to spend some $$$ on something like, say, *this* ---

...instead of a tattoo, at this point in time?

Obama won't be signing any anti-tattoo bills into law anytime soon, y'know?