Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNBC's Marijuana Inc Video
HULU via CNBC ^ | CNBC

Posted on 01/25/2009 10:28:56 AM PST by MAD-AS-HELL

No article just a video for those who didn't see it and might want to watch. If California wants a nice steady stream of income, they'd be smart to LEGALIZE POT. The efforts to eradicate not only aren't working but wasting a lot of money and time when our cops could be fighting REAL CRIME.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; babe; border; borderpatrol; borders; bordersecurity; cnbc; illegalaliens; marijuana; minutemen; pot; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Need4Truth

Well, I never stated that smoking the stuff is good or safe. I am just stating that I think it’s better to legalize it, regulate it and tax it. It’s a wild goose chase that only causes more harm keeping it illegal.


21 posted on 01/25/2009 11:19:59 AM PST by MAD-AS-HELL (How does one win over terrorists? KILL them with UNKINDNESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

It would be implemented the same way the tax on whiskey was implemented back in the time of the whiskey-rebellion...


22 posted on 01/25/2009 11:25:14 AM PST by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL
NEWS FLASH! Pot will never be legal until two major things happen.

1) develop a “roadside test” like a Breathalyzer that will accurately measure pot in the system, AND come up with reasonable standards for acceptable legal levels.

2) Ban 3rd party lawsuits from injuries related to pot use.
ie...Suing the employer because an employee injured someone or himself while having pot in their system.

#1 Will be difficult and #2 will be impossible to get past the RAT controlled Congress.

Give it up, will never happen.

23 posted on 01/25/2009 11:26:20 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

One thing that would keep use down even if it were legalized is the fact that employers could still test and refuse to hire people who do use. So that should still discourage many from using pot, even if it were legalized.


24 posted on 01/25/2009 11:29:26 AM PST by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL
If California wants a nice steady stream of income, they'd be smart to LEGALIZE POT.

Maybe they should start with allowing offshore drilling for oil first.

-PJ

25 posted on 01/25/2009 11:31:23 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (You can never overestimate the Democrats' ability to overplay their hand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
“One thing that would keep use down even if it were legalized is the fact that employers could still test and refuse to hire people who do use.”

How do you refuse to hire, or fire, someone for using a legal product? Unions will happily go along with that?

LOL...Good luck.

26 posted on 01/25/2009 11:36:03 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

There are plenty of companies who refuse to hire tobacco users, and that has withstood legal challenges.


27 posted on 01/25/2009 11:37:09 AM PST by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

The reason they can refuse to hire people that smoke is because the anti-smoking Nazis are liberals.

The unions wont allow even the anti-smoking rules.


28 posted on 01/25/2009 11:42:50 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

With each passing day, unions are becoming more and more irrelevant.


29 posted on 01/25/2009 11:43:48 AM PST by dfwgator (1996 2006 2008 - Good Things Come in Threes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

ZERO is going to change that. “Card check” ring a bell?


30 posted on 01/25/2009 11:46:01 AM PST by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL

De-criminalizing MaryJ will relieve pressure on the court and jail systems, deprive law enforcement of cash and property seizures and generally force those two systems to find alternate means of funding or else reduce their staffs.

It’s never going to happen.


31 posted on 01/25/2009 11:49:18 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

they’ll legalize pot WAY before they let those evil oil companies drill!


32 posted on 01/25/2009 11:50:14 AM PST by MAD-AS-HELL (How does one win over terrorists? KILL them with UNKINDNESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL

Oh, forgot to mention, there’s no qualitative test for pot intoxication as it stays in the urine for weeks. Companies open themselves up to liability hiring someone who tested positive to a legal substance and then causes an accident that could be blamed on that substance intoxication.

This will have to be resolved through the courts before legalization is allowed.


33 posted on 01/25/2009 11:57:05 AM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
Just how do you propose taxing an item for which there is an established tax free market which currently avoids the law? Why should pot dealers and growers start paying a tax? Who would collect the tax? What would be the penalties of selling untaxed pot? I’ve never heard a reasonable explanation of how this would be done.

Horse crap, we did it after Prohibition with no problem at all.

-ccm

34 posted on 01/25/2009 11:57:14 AM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat

“Just how do you propose taxing an item for which there is an established tax free market which currently avoids the law?”

The same way they do on alchohol. My sweetie & I make our own wine - legally. The amount we can produce is limited & we can’t sell it. But there are lots of dope-heads who don’t have a green thumb & would be just as happy to buy it as try to grow it. Better quality, too.

Legalizing makes sense even if they can’t tax it. At least we wouldn’t be paying for the cops to waste their time on it & we wouldn’t be locking up otherwise law-abiding folks who want a toke now & then.


35 posted on 01/25/2009 12:00:15 PM PST by Twotone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Twotone; SmallGovRepub
I would add to your points that the Mexican drug cartels would be deprived of the bulk of their profits. Freeper SGR has the figures.
36 posted on 01/25/2009 12:10:28 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
How do you refuse to hire, or fire, someone for using a legal product? Unions will happily go along with that?

In the State of Florida, no firefighter may use any tobacco product on or off duty. It's been that way for ten or fifteen years. Quite a few businesses refuse to hire smokers, with the justification that having a non-smoking workforce reduces their insurance rates.

That being said, speaking as someone who's worked emergency services danged near forever (31 years) I see little reason to keep marijuana illegal. No I don't smoke marijuana, although I used to.

I don't think I've ever been to a wreck where marijuana was a significant contributing factor. Cocaine? Yep. Booze? Close to 50% of all wrecks I've been to. Heroin? Not as much, but it's less common. Lots of heroin ODs, though, as a percentage of heroin users. Meth? They just fall apart right in front of you. Crack? Same as meth.

As to marijuana being a gateway drug, probably it is. Some of that, though, is that to get marijuana, you have to deal with the same people that are selling other drugs.

Right now, the Feds won't allow it to be legalized. If the Feds backed off, I think Washington, Oregon and California would legalize it, as well as some of the more libertarian states like Montana.

37 posted on 01/25/2009 12:10:46 PM PST by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Need4Truth
THC, which is the stuff in pot that produces the high, has a 3-day half life. That means that after smokeing pot and people begin to feel they are no longer high, but they are still impaired. That’s the danger in smoking pot. People who only smoke it on weekends are continuously impaired. That’s probably why they call it dope.

Nobody stays "impaired" for three days from smoking pot. Just because THC stays in your system for weeks before finally being untraceable, doesn't mean that there is any form of impairment. The "high" from smoking pot lasts a few hours at most, and that's only if it's really potent weed and the person smoking it has gone for many days without at toke. Even your choice of the word "impaired" is a misnomer. Having the munchies, getting into deep philosophical discussions about God, listening to music, and laughing at cartoons does not qualify as "impaired."

38 posted on 01/25/2009 12:18:44 PM PST by highimpact (Abortion - [n]: human sacrifice at the altar of convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: highimpact

The metabolytes from THC, which is what they test for, have a long half-life in your system, but they aren’t THC any more.


39 posted on 01/25/2009 12:21:43 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
It would be nice if the financial crisis managed to get drugs legalized and taxed (therefore becoming a boon to government) rather than prohibited and interdicted (being a cost for government). But I doubt Our Fearless Leaders have the foresight and wisdom to do this.

Ahh, but you miss the point. Only a person who is totally hide bound and steep in their own self righteousness doesn't think legalizing drugs would totally take the money and the crime out of drugs, therefore ending a useless and, actually, harmful to some totally lawful citizens, WOD. The politicians of this country(not all, but a lot of them)don't want to legalize drugs because they get their cut. Why do you think Ramos and Compean went to jail? Because they hid a few shell casings? They only committed a couple of misdemeanors and ended up with 12 years in the slam because they shot one of the sacred cows of the Mexican and US politicans: A drug dealer.

Bush went along with it, why? Who knows, but the bottom line is: Until we get the politicians out of office who are getting their cut, we will continue to have drugs running across the border and continue to have our useless WOD. Take the money out of it and you will end it, just as repealing prohibition ended the vast majority of bootlegging.

40 posted on 01/25/2009 12:29:42 PM PST by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson