To: rabscuttle385; Clintonfatigued; Miss Didi; LottieDah; firebrand; montag813; goldstategop; ...
I wouldn't say McCain "threw" the election, but there were obviously some issues which he neglected to raise and others which he brought up too late to be maximally effective. He was
too "honorable" in his approach. If he really was "throwing" the election, he would never have picked Palin as his running mate.
The GOP has to revamp its primary rules in order to make it more difficult for a candidate like McCain, who was obviously garnering much less than a majority of party support in the primaries, from getting the nomination so easily. My suggestion is to get rid of "winner take all" state primaries, and to allocate some delegates to second and third place finishers in in all states.
To: justiceseeker93
I wouldn't say McCain "threw" the election...
He was too "honorable" in his approach. I cannot remember a time I have ever disagreed with you, however, this would be that time. (please mark your calender) ;*)
get rid of "winner take all" state primaries
Good, back to normal and once again, I agree completely.
Case in point - Virginia. With 50.04% MeInsane received all 63 delegates.
Also there should be no open primaries. Why allow the demonrats to vote in republican primaries and vice versa.
66 posted on
01/25/2009 10:34:44 AM PST by
Just A Nobody
(I *LOVE* my Attitude Problem - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
To: justiceseeker93; rabscuttle385
"I wouldn't say McCain "threw" the election"
I would. I never saw any GOP Presidential candidate that anxious to lose.
94 posted on
01/25/2009 4:27:09 PM PST by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson