Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Melinda; All
Of course, I never expected you to weigh my words... Your comments proclaim: elitist.

I really don't care who you are. Your argumenum ad authoritium shows it all.
Point-of-fact: Many Congress-critters of both Houses have had photo-ops w/my flightcrew, and in speaking w/them I have encountered many who don't understand the Constitution, even when the writers of that document are quoted. So, your placement in a political beauty contest holds no awe.
And, I wouldn't care if you were Limbaugh himself, (or Beck, Hannity, Levin, etc...). You are mistaken in your excoriation of the people here and I will not stand mute!

I have used no foul language, and kept my arguments civil, to the point, and provided support for them. Yet you treat me to the same excoriation you "reserve" for those who you proclaim offend your sensibilities.
Instead, as would any good elitist, you don't answer the arguments but proclaim your station raises you above them. Well, good for you! Are you G(H)WB, Palin, Jindal, or RR?[grin] (btw: RR, can I get your autograph?)
As I stated, the people here feel betrayed. They see that betrayal as ongoing. JM effects the Country w/his votes. JM votes Socialist. Therefore, JM must be defeated at the voting booth. That people need to keep reminding themselves that contrary to his claims, JM's results hurt the Republic is natural because the call on them to vote for him is posed via emotional arguments, not intellectual ones!
If you'd get off your high-horse, you're intelligent enough to see that. Whether you'll admit it is something else. If you really believed what your nagging you'd be setting a better example not denigrating people over an understandable human reaction. Telling people they're trash won't open them to your POV.
And I might point out a minor point: JM has started a PAC to continue molding "R"s into his image & has stated he is seriously thinking of running in 2012. I know he lies, but should we take the chance?

104 posted on 01/26/2009 7:16:51 AM PST by mike.musculus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: mike.musculus

“I have used no foul language, and kept my arguments civil, to the point, and provided support for them. Yet you treat me to the same excoriation you “reserve” for those who you proclaim offend your sensibilities. “

You are accusing me of saying you use foul language? Again, you are quite verbose but unable to read to save your argument. Please quote me where I have done this. I DO care who you are. You are a newbie with a tired agenda against McCain, that much is obvious. It’s a shame you have nothing better to do with your time.


106 posted on 01/26/2009 7:33:57 AM PST by Melinda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

To: mike.musculus
The nastiest posters - their replies have been so similar it makes me wonder if it was one person - during the election were the McCain supporters.

One of the many negative impression McCain left, in addition to signs of being confused and having memory lapses, was how glibly and how frequently he lied even in cases where is was bound to be exposed - just like a sociopath.

The election was lost the day McCain was nominated. Did anyone really believe he could win? He was creepy, and nobody concerned with the future of the country would ever promote amnesty - he even voted against the Cronyn amendment. Then there is his poor record on the POW/MIA. His treatment of his first wife was outrageous, and who would want Cindy for a First Lady?

108 posted on 01/26/2009 7:39:32 AM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson