Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/24/2009 4:40:38 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
Coming soon:
By order of our messiah Lord Barack Hussein Obama all citizens are required to stop pooping...immediately...violaters will be taxed on a per poop basis. Repeat offenders will be executed.

2 posted on 01/24/2009 4:56:35 PM PST by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This stuff used to go straight to the landfill. I wonder when they started using it as fertilizer?


3 posted on 01/24/2009 4:58:07 PM PST by mamelukesabre (Give me Liberty or give me something to aim at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
"Although the average concentrations were similar to those in previous small-scale studies, several samples harbored up to 440 parts per million of triclocarban, which is added to antimicrobial soap and other personal care products. That's almost 10 times higher than ever reported in biosolids"

and who doesn't believe advertising works - look at the increase in the household use of "antimicrobial soap", in just recent years, so naturally the rate of the chemicals therein MUST show up in the water that came from our bathrooms and kitchens!!!!!!

the question is: is this fostering another situation like what happens when people take too many antibiotics too often - we kill too many "good" germs in our system and the bad germs develop resistance to the antibiotics

can we do the same type of thing to the growing systems in the soil?

4 posted on 01/24/2009 4:58:23 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
In other news:
Former Vice-President Albert Gore, Jr. has announce the formation of a new company. This company will provide poop off-sets for those unable to comply with the messiah's new edict prohibiting pooping. Mr. Gore assures the public that all poop off-sets will be environmentally neutral.

5 posted on 01/24/2009 5:00:21 PM PST by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

I think the farms sewage sludge is typically used on are non-food farms such as sod farms.


6 posted on 01/24/2009 5:02:02 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The farmers quit using it around here because it had too much salt in it.


7 posted on 01/24/2009 5:04:24 PM PST by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem


"It's all your fault, man."
8 posted on 01/24/2009 5:05:52 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
What's the downside to clean water? Dirty sludge.

Idiot comment.

Assuming the sludge contains such contaminants, how is dumping it into rivers supposed to be better for the environment?

10 posted on 01/24/2009 5:21:07 PM PST by Sherman Logan (Everyone has a right to his own opinion, but not to his own facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

TDP would solve this problem in large measure; the product would end up for the most part distilled water, gas and oil with a small amount of carbon solids. Google up TDP oil for more information.


12 posted on 01/24/2009 5:31:19 PM PST by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
What's the downside to clean water? Dirty sludge.

One of murphy's laws is that "Nothing gets clean unless something else is made dirty" (from an old poster long thrown out by 'Th Little Lady'). Kind of gives the eco-nuts a problem they would rather not think about.

14 posted on 01/24/2009 5:43:50 PM PST by fella (.He that followeth after vain persons shall have poverty enough." Pv.28:19')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Big farmers in my County were pushing for it’s use a few years ago. They referred to it as “nutrients”. Even the Farm Bureau was in favor of it. I am against spreading sludge on farmland. Heavy minerals will migrate through the soil and eventually reach the water table and aquifers. Land that has had sludge applied should be documented by the County and State, as well as recorded on the property deed. Other landowners, whose wells may be contaminated should have access to these records to sue for damages. Potential buyers should also know that sludge was spread on that property as well.


23 posted on 01/24/2009 8:58:44 PM PST by derSchurfer (When the Rule of Law is ignored good citizens will take the law into their own hands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson