Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nominal
Do the law that defines natural born citizen is self evident?

Well, it is not apparently self evident to Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito who have not voted to accept any case involving the NBC question.

55 posted on 01/28/2009 2:11:34 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: trumandogz

Yes, it’s obvious what natural born citizen means.

Since SCOTUS hasn’t said why they denied anything, let alone ‘denied because we think Obama is a natural born citizen’, it could mean any number of things. Bad presentation by the lawyer, timing, standing, wrong person sued, incorrect precedence cited, etc.. Maybe they don’t want to risk riots just yet, and will give it a few months or a year. Maybe they’re scared. Maybe they think it’s not their place.

I have no idea, but probably last on that list is them not knowing about the Constitution...

However, if there are 5 of 9 that are ‘living Constitutionalists’, for example, and voted to change it to shoe-horn in Obama, they’d be making a huge mistake. I suspect there is much more going on here with the attack on the Constitution and on U.S. sovereignty, but so far, SCOTUS isn’t talking.


56 posted on 01/28/2009 2:33:39 PM PST by nominal (Christus dominus. Christus veritas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson