Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: twigs; All

Back when the Wachovia merger was due to take place, I went to take some cash out of my Equity Line, just in case I needed it. I spoke with a bank manager who said in the summer they had reduced some people’s Equity Lines. I was only registered for 1/5th my equity so was not affected. He also said they expected the merger to go well, so I ended up only taking 1/2 the amount I had planned.

It is unbelievable what the CEO’s of these organizations are paid. I checked “Forbes Executive Compensation” and have this information for 5/3/07, just before the big meltdowns began. It is no wonder they are going broke. Here is the CEO pay in salary and (shares).

- Wachovia, $11 Million, (38 million shares)
- Citigroup, $18M, (8M)
- Wells Fargo, $72M, (135M)
- Lehman Brothers, $52M, (754M)
- Bank of America, $100M, (145M)
- Merrill Lynch, $36M, (114M)

It is no wonder they are going broke paying those salaries. I tried to find the stock values for 5/3/07, but was unable. If anyone else can I would love to see them and have the link.

-


12 posted on 01/23/2009 12:43:02 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: gleeaikin

To be blunt, those salaries, as high as they seem to you and me, are just a drop in the bucket compared to the total monies being moved during that same year. They would be well worth it—if the banks were solid. Right now, it’s a bit harder to justify.


14 posted on 01/23/2009 12:47:51 PM PST by Buggman (HebrewRoot.com - Baruch haBa b'Shem ADONAI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin

Want to see something much scarier? Check this out... http://www.glennbeck.com/images/pod/012209-pod2-big.gif


16 posted on 01/23/2009 12:51:00 PM PST by AvOrdVet ("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: gleeaikin
Companies don't go broke because they can't afford excessive executive compensation packages. They go broke because these packages actively discourage stewardship.

The purpose of a good executive compensation package is to align executive interest with shareholder interest. However, once compensation passes a certain point this alignment is no longer effective. Indeed, it is counterproductive since it focuses executive energy on short-term goals (this year's mega-bonus) rather than long-term business success.

Aside from pure greed/ego, what real incentive does a CEO have to look out for the best interest of a company and its employees/shareholders if he knows that no matter what happens to the company this year's bonus gives him set-for-life financial independence?

Nobody should be surprised that these lotto-sized payoffs lead to reckless disregard for anything beyond the big payday.

40 posted on 01/23/2009 1:24:51 PM PST by AustinBill (consequence is what makes our choices real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson