If you disagree with an idea or statement, argue the statement. Don't attack the poster.
I didn't "pull" anything. I properly quoted what was written.
It is quite clear what they "yes" is to.
It is also clear that confirming they have the original record, after having seen the internet copy, and saying "yes" to was he born in Hawaii, is pretty solid confirmation. Had that internet copy contained false information they could have said so. Hawaii does not have just anyone's birth information on file. They have it on file because he was born there.
Assertions that he could have a birth certificate there without being born there are false.
It’s an observation you are a good propagandist.
It looks like nonsense to me that I debunked in detail.
What is clear is that the author from "The Swamp" played word games to obfuscate, which misleads the reader that I pointed out in my above post.