Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
The difficulty (IMO) would be presenting sufficient evidence to get to the discovery phase. It would be ‘proving a negative’.

Why is that a problem? You simply request that the court subpoena records that would be dispositive of the key issue in the case. It is done all the time - does anyone think that this is the only time in history that one party to a lawsuit has tried to hide documentary evidence from the other side and/or the court?

48 posted on 01/22/2009 3:13:02 PM PST by Ancesthntr (Dedicated to stopping the Obamination and his minions from destroying the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Ancesthntr

Sure, but there is some minimal evidence you have to have (I’m not a lawyer) for the case to have merit. All I’ve seen on these threads is evidence that he hasn’t proven he’s qualified. Nothing that shows (IMO) that he isn’t.

I’d like to see Zobama sued by one of the WH staff for freezing their pay. Get this started right away.


50 posted on 01/22/2009 3:19:48 PM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson