Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dascallie
Obama's eligibility question has been rendered moot by the fact that he has been sworn into the office. The only way to remove him now is by the process of impeachment.

Even if the courts decided today he was not legally eligible, they do not have the power to remove him from office. Only the Senate has that power and they only have that power if presented with a bill of impeachment from the house.

It is out of the hands of any court at this point.

19 posted on 01/22/2009 7:14:53 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe

Nope. If he was never eligible then he is not President. If found to be ineligible, the whole thing was a fraud. Claiming ignorance to eligibility status will not be a defense.


57 posted on 01/22/2009 7:50:10 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

The court cannot remove the president.

They can merely rule his acts are not binding because he does not meet the qualifications- when presented with a suit seeking such relief of course.

what a potential mess.


75 posted on 01/22/2009 8:33:39 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

The court should decide on the merits. He may run again in 2012 and this mess needs to be cleared up before then.


89 posted on 01/22/2009 9:35:55 AM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe
Interesting....

Would it also be the case if, say, a President was caught, live on TV, committing murder?

104 posted on 01/22/2009 10:40:16 AM PST by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe
P-Marlowe said: "It is out of the hands of any court at this point."

I don't think you have been paying attention to what recently transpired in the White House.

Through "an abundance of caution", the White House counsel advised and Obama agreed to have the oath of office administered a second time.

Now, why was that? I'll tell you why. Because any actions of Obama prior to taking the oath could be successfully challenged as being of no legal effect because Obama had not fulfilled the Constitutional requirements in order to exercise the powers of the Presidency.

This issue differs in no significant way whatever from the Constitutional requirement of being a natural-born citizen. If Obama is not a natural-born citizen, then any act he carries out in the White House can be successfully challenged. His signature on Congressional legislation would carry no more weight than yours or mine.

A reporter asked the White House spokesman whether Obama would be re-signing the executive orders that he signed prior to the second oath-taking. Though the spokesman seemed to be suggesting that it wasn't necessary, I predict that those orders will be re-signed before the week is out.

116 posted on 01/22/2009 12:30:50 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

Obama’s eligibility question has been rendered moot by the fact that he has been sworn into the office. The only way to remove him now is by the process of impeachment.

Even if the courts decided today he was not legally eligible, they do not have the power to remove him from office. Only the Senate has that power and they only have that power if presented with a bill of impeachment from the house.

It is out of the hands of any court at this point.

***

Not necessarily so ... these are uncharted waters here governed by a Constitution that was written without forseeing a potential situation like this ...

If (and I am specifying IF) SCOTUS took one of these challenge petitions, they MIGHT determine that ONLY a constitutionally eligible person can enter into the office as POTUS.

If they did, and it was determined that Obama was NOT constitutionally eligible, they might rule that he never entered the office in the first place - even if he did take the oath. Therefore, no impeachment. Impeachment is reserved for an eligible person inaugurated as POTUS who committed “high crimes and misdemeanors” while in office.

It is akin to annulling a contract when one party is found to have entered into upon the basis of fraud - the contract is automatically null and void.


142 posted on 01/22/2009 9:45:56 PM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

You said — “Even if the courts decided today he was not legally eligible, they do not have the power to remove him from office. Only the Senate has that power and they only have that power if presented with a bill of impeachment from the house.”

I’ve been *assured* by some educated FReepers here (educated by Constitutional lawyers, no less...) that all that is required is for some Marshal with court orders to go to the White House and escort Obama off the premises, for not ever being legally qualified to hold office. It’s as simple as that, I’m told — by these educated Freepers — even when I’ve pointed out what the Constitution says.

I guess we’ll see what happens when a Marshal goes walking into the White House... :-)


168 posted on 01/23/2009 10:30:02 AM PST by Star Traveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson