Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlo
mlo said: "The Senate certainly should have removed the rapist, but they had no legal obligation to do so."

Says you.

Clinton took an oath to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and was proved to have obstructed justice and perjured himself in an attempt to deny Paula Jones due process. If it had been you whose case had been obstructed by a sitting President, would it be your opinion that the Congress had no legal obligation to remove that President?

148 posted on 01/22/2009 10:18:39 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
"If it had been you whose case had been obstructed by a sitting President, would it be your opinion that the Congress had no legal obligation to remove that President?"

It's a fact. In an impeachment the Senate is not a court interpreting a law and bound to follow. Impeachment is a political act. The Senate is free to use their judgement. Ultimately, they can refuse to remove a known criminal (which they did), and they can remove a president because they really don't like him.

152 posted on 01/23/2009 6:52:09 AM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson