He talks a good game for publication, but when it came down to his actual work, he refused to support the Second Amendment.
What that tells me is that he trusts government, not individuals. Despite all his holy talk, when push comes to shove he'll be backing the government.
That's why a politician's position on the 2nd Amendment is my litmus test. It tells me whether he trusts me or not.
Judge Bork does not trust me.
“he refused to support the Second Amendment.”
I hereby direct you to cater to my laziness and give me a citation for that.
Or...rather...maybe...could you tell me someplace to look that up?