To: pobeda1945
Russian helicopters are good but the future of all helicopters for combat is getting dimmer. They are too slow, fly too low, and have easily detectable signatures, which makes them easily shot down in the modern battlefield.
The helicopter has already become this era's "biplane" and will only survive in the safer rear areas from now on.
To: pobeda1945
If I had a choice between wrestling a 12’ croc or flying in a Russian helo, I'd take the croc.
3 posted on
01/21/2009 4:02:02 AM PST by
ryan71
To: pobeda1945
Many Russian helicopters look ugly and strange to me...
4 posted on
01/21/2009 4:19:19 AM PST by
Bobalu
(McCain has been proven to be the rino flop I always thought he was.)
To: pobeda1945
I’ll stick with the Apachee and American built helicopters.
5 posted on
01/21/2009 4:40:32 AM PST by
Bulldawg Fan
(Victory is the last thing Murtha and his fellow Defeatists want.)
Whoa! An onboard digital computer in those Kamovs! And helmet-mounted target designators with thermal imagery technology! Jeez louise! When the shooting starts, every hostile nearby, in the sky or on the ground, is doomed.
6 posted on
01/21/2009 5:25:38 AM PST by
flowerplough
(Liberalism undermined: Certain permanent moral and political truths are accessible to human reason.)
To: pobeda1945
I read somewhere that when Igor Ivanovich Sikorsky needed to introduce himself at New York cocktail parties, he would twirl a finger above his head to preempt the question whether he was the Sikorsky.
9 posted on
01/21/2009 9:28:21 AM PST by
cynwoody
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson