Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Give Obama A Pass on Oath Flub?
FreeRepublic Exclusive ^ | 1/20/2009 | DouglasKC

Posted on 01/20/2009 8:49:03 PM PST by DouglasKC

Give Obama A Pass on Oath Flub?

Have you heard?

Chief Justice Roberts mixed some words around in the Presidential oath that Presidents take upon assuming the office.

The oath should read as follows:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

It seems that Chief Justice Roberts put the word "faithfully" in the wrong place. It was then repeated incorrectly by Mr. Obama.

Should we give Mr. Obama a pass?

I don't think so. And I'll explain why.

Mr. Obama should have known the oath backwards and forwards. He is a constitutional scholar. He must have studied the oath. He surely was briefed on the correct wording.

If you watch the swearing in, it seems certain that Mr. Obama realizes that Chief Justice Roberts has stated the oath wrong. Yet.

Yet Mr. Obama repeats it back, wrong also.

What does this show? We have two possiblities.

The first is that Mr. Obama really didn't know the oath. He never memorized it. He didn't know that the words were mixed up. As stated previously this isn't really plausible. He knew it.

The second option is rather unsettling. Mr. Obama knew the oath. He knew it backward and forward. He knew the right and proper wording specified by the Constitution of the United States. Yet he repeated back the error.

No big deal?

Think about it. This was Mr. Obama's very first act as President. It was a relatively high pressure situation. Around the world there were millions of eyes focused on him. Expectations were high. Nerves, no doubt, were on edge. Yet, when faced with standing up for the right wording, he folded. He agreed with error.

Now maybe he did this to save Chief Justice Roberts from an embarrassing situation. Maybe he did it to prevent himself from appearing "wrong" to the public. Maybe he just wanted to put forth the appearance that everything went smoothly. But are these the attributes we want in a President?

We want the President to be a leader. We want him to stand up for what's right even when everybody else is wrong. We want him to make the decision in the most pressure packed situations. We want him to uphold the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic.

Yet at his very first opportunity he decided that getting along at the moment was more important than a constitutional requirement.

It's going to be a long four, or eight, years.


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bhoinauguration; flubbedoath; justiceroberts; oath; oathofoffice; obama; obamaoath; obamaswearingin; robertsflubbedoath; robertsflubsoath; swearingin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last
To: rjp2005
However, oath or not, he’s the President as of noon yesterday. Who was the Pres so drunk that he couldnt finish the oath thus ushering in that law?

I have no idea. It was also kind of weird that the oath wasn't done until after noon. If I remember correctly isn't the oath usually done just before noon so that you have pledged before you actually become President?

21 posted on 01/20/2009 9:03:01 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Its sort of related to what would happen after noon on the 20th if we were Pearl Harbored but the ceremony was behind schedule and the new President had not be sworn in - who is President, do we even have a President.

ABC (yeah I know, not my favorite source either) said the consensus among legal scholars was that the new President takes office at noon, oath or no oath.

That’s better than the other choice that if the new VP has been sworn - he would be acting President until the new President completed the ceremony.


22 posted on 01/20/2009 9:03:01 PM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44

Exactly: he’ll get all the free passes W got.


23 posted on 01/20/2009 9:03:39 PM PST by txhurl (Welcome home, W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I expect his inner Kleagle arced out...


24 posted on 01/20/2009 9:04:07 PM PST by an amused spectator (Citizen Kenyan: The man who created The Sock-Puppet Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
Obama made the first mistake.

Obama interrupted Chief Justice Roberts FIRST!!!

Obama made the first mistake. He was giggling before the swearing in like a clown. Then he interrupted Roberts which lead to Roberts being thrown.

He was giggling before he started. The whole ceremony was a joke to Clown Hussein. He was laughing when the swearing in first started and then HE INTERRUPTED the Chief Justice.

25 posted on 01/20/2009 9:04:16 PM PST by chrt30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Lowery screwed up too... My grandma taught me that it goes like this: “If it’s yellow let it mellow, if it’s brown flush it down.”


26 posted on 01/20/2009 9:05:22 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
I think you underestimate the power of nerves when standing in front of millions of people. Forget an oath, you can forget your own NAME when those nerves hit home. It is horribly, horribly embarrassing, but I do not consider this a concern about the Obama presidency. Let’s wait until we have good reason. It won’t be long.

That's my point. He let the situation get to him. He's been in the public eye for years. He's been before huge crowds. Yet when the opportunity to do the right thing presented itself, he punted. If he can't do or say the right thing in this innocuous situation then what is he going to do when there's something really on the line?

27 posted on 01/20/2009 9:06:04 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

lol


28 posted on 01/20/2009 9:06:34 PM PST by GeronL (DAY 1, YEAR 0 - The first day of the Oministration. The nightmare begins.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: chrt30

Yep, threw Roberts off his game, RIGHT ON THE FIRST LINE!


29 posted on 01/20/2009 9:06:38 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Oh, and I’d like to say something to anyone who might criticize my dipiction of it as “just a ceremony” by saying it’s part of the Constitution and if we ignore one part of the Constitution it endangers all the other parts, and so on. The Constitution does not say that the president has to be sworn in by the Chief Justice on the steps of the Capitol building (or wherever) in front of millions of people. All it says is that he has to take the oath.

To my mind, that means he could say it to himself as he’s drifting off to sleep. But no, these politicians have to makie a big display of everything, and we all have to pause in the middle of our lives to listen to them say a sentence.


30 posted on 01/20/2009 9:06:41 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
It's going to be a long four, or eight, years.

Especially if we hyper-focus on things like this. Our nation is under attack and the best we can do is complain about the way the President took the oath. Flame me if you will but I see this as absurdly trivial.

31 posted on 01/20/2009 9:07:17 PM PST by newheart (Obama. We kind of underestimated the creepiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

flubbed the oath of office... and that just the start.. rofl


32 posted on 01/20/2009 9:07:43 PM PST by Ancient Drive (will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
They told us he was a brilliant constitutional professor, he was cool, and a great orator.

Yet he could not save his oath...made a fool of himself.

It was an EPIC FAIL.

And I am laughing my arse off, and will mock him to everyone I meet from this day forward.

33 posted on 01/20/2009 9:07:58 PM PST by roses of sharon (Pray Hussein fails!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

Would Bush have been given a pass?

Yeah, we know the answer to that.


34 posted on 01/20/2009 9:08:23 PM PST by Names Ash Housewares (Refusing to kneel before the socialist messiah. 1-20-13 Freedom Day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
It was also kind of weird that the oath wasn't done until after noon. If I remember correctly isn't the oath usually done just before noon so that you have pledged before you actually become President?

My recollection of the color commentary from 1988 was that the media proclaimed Dan Quayle to be the Acting President for a few minutes before Bush 41 took the oath.

Today the media made it a point that the oath was essentially irrelevant or ceremonial.

35 posted on 01/20/2009 9:08:28 PM PST by cmj328 (Filibuster FOCA or lose reelection)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
here’s the thing. It’s just a ceremony. Plenty of people who’ve recited the oath perfectly have gone on to violate various passages of, if not the spirit of, the Constitution. The reverse is probably also true.

Well again here's the point. He knew what was right. But in a pressure situation he went along with error to get out of the situation. It's telling.

36 posted on 01/20/2009 9:09:01 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: DouglasKC
Marxist Obama went back on his firm word on federal campaign financing, then lied about why, then blamed Republicans.

His word means absolutely nothing.

Nothing.

The man has no self-respect.

None.

.

38 posted on 01/20/2009 9:10:19 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC

I think Hoover simply stated “I do” when he was sworn in 80 years ago.


39 posted on 01/20/2009 9:10:28 PM PST by RPTMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
I think you underestimate the power of nerves when standing in front of millions of people. Forget an oath, you can forget your own NAME when those nerves hit home. It is horribly, horribly embarrassing, but I do not consider this a concern about the Obama presidency. Let’s wait until we have good reason. It won’t be long.

I agree. Attacking someone for typical human errors makes us look small and petty. We do not need an Olbermann branch of conservatism.

40 posted on 01/20/2009 9:10:34 PM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson