Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee
Many do not know why the case brought forth. At the time, McCorvey had already delivered the child and the case was moot.

Later McCorvey recanted her testimony, was not held in contempt of court, but the case went on anyway. Go figure.
52 posted on 01/20/2009 2:59:49 PM PST by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: BIGLOOK

The case was NEVER about McCorvey’s baby, they could have easily found a doctor to perform an illegal abortion if that was what she really wanted. Roe v. Wade was about clearing the way to kill 50 MILLION other babies.


53 posted on 01/20/2009 3:13:03 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson