Aw, what’s the matter, noob? Did someone profane your Dear Leader?
Yes, the third paragraph of American Heritage does mention that it may be used as a synonym of “enormousness,” and also posts that this is “usage problem” which may cause bursts of laughter.
>> Stupid post...if you want to call him evil just do it on your own instead of twisting words with partially sited facts.. <<
Did someone fail to enforce the “fairness doctrine” on all these heretics around here? America’s about to crash into the toilet, and we reserve the right to have some gallows humor about the ignorant, evil bureaucrats who are doing it. So go back to the Daily KOS and quit whining like a spoiled toddler.
So I’ve tried to reply 3 times to your post over the past two hours, but it seems there is a huge delay or somebody doesn’t want me posting anymore...I was going to let you know that I’m not an “obamabot”, I did this stuff with Bush haters too. Even non-presidential figures. If its legit, I’m down with it. If its not I don’t stand for it. I just have issues with people who don’t do their full research. In this case it seems clear they used a different dictionary than the American-Heritage Dictionary. So this whole discussion on Jay Nordlinger posting on http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTFjNWMzYjA5ZjViNTIyZWQzYzI4YjIzNTEzM2ZlMzc= is a mute point.
I fully expect Obama to make legit word use mistakes, just like we all do. I even expect him to make even more important mistakes that actually affect our livelihoods. He’s not perfect, nor was Bush, nor any other president that held the office. But it seems the moderators of the thread want to let it end with erkyl calling me an obamabot and that I’m the stereotypical Obama worshiper, etc. Maybe they like suppressing voices that make legitimate points that do not agree with the sites mainstream thoughts???