Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tsnyder91

No, I got your point, but as a lover of the English language, I find it irritating when people, such as yourself, excuse the maligning of words while simultaneously misusing words themselves. I was going to post a response which indicated that we should not concern ourselves with such trivialities and details since Obama was probably going to mandate a change in the acceptable definition of enormity because of his constant misuse of the word, but I found pointing out your little error much more satisfying.


41 posted on 01/21/2009 7:28:21 AM PST by erkyl (The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in a period of moral crisis, stay neutral)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: erkyl

Glad I could satisfy you. The real issue behind this is a battle of dictionaries. It seems Merriam-Webster believes that language should evolve and new words and/or definitions can be added simply by popular use. They recently added ‘meh’ after all. Whereas it seems the American-Heritage dictionary runs through a panel in an effort to protect or control or force, depending on your view of it, classic word usage rejecting popular usage.


42 posted on 01/21/2009 7:38:28 AM PST by tsnyder91
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson