Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus

There was a copy of the invitation to the inauguration in our newspaper over the weekend. The year was stated as “two thousand and nine”. Seems to me that this in incorrect grammar? Does anyone know?


20 posted on 01/20/2009 8:18:05 AM PST by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NEMDF

For those who recognize the enormity of the situation, I respectfully suggest “two uh-oh nine” as an option.

When the Clinton folks left the White House, I recall stories about computer keyboards with the W key removed. I’d like to see Alan Keyes get inaugurated in 2012 — and fully expect that all the keys will removed by the Obama folks on their way out.


32 posted on 01/20/2009 9:03:14 AM PST by Steve Schulin (Cheap electricity gives your average Joe a life better than kings used to enjoy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: NEMDF

>> There was a copy of the invitation to the inauguration in our newspaper over the weekend. The year was stated as “two thousand and nine”. Seems to me that this in incorrect grammar? Does anyone know? <<

Two Thousand Nine is normal. It would definitely be incorrect to say Two Thousand and Seven Hundred, but I believe it’s just being a little overly formal to add the “and.”


44 posted on 01/21/2009 9:42:34 AM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson