==Funny how the article you keep citing still mentions that 150 million years ago is the point of divergence.
That’s the Evo interpretation of the evidence. And that’s why the Australian evos were so surprised, because the theory informing their expectations turned out so utterly wrong. The fact that they still cling to the 150 million year divergence is an article of faith, not science.
If it were faith they would keep the evidence to themselves. The point is that the new evidence hasn't changed their estimate for the divergence time.
The trickery here is the creationists taking non-scientific statements made for the purpose of writing an article for a non-scientific audience, and jumping to scientific conclusions from them. I don't think Jesus would approve of the willful promotion of ignorance about God's creation.