Finding DNA does NOT mean mom or dad did not do it, it just means someone else may have been involced.
How about a kiddie porn ring? that would explain the DNA ‘sample’ from another person.
It only adds another unknown person to the case. It does NOT EXONERATE anyone!
And the police are foolish to make this big apology, because they must know this.
Maybe the Ramsey’s are part of the Illuminati so they are immune from prosecution... this case has WEIRD written all over it.
The facts still remain that there was no evidence of an intruder, the note was written INSIDE the house with house paper and pen, in moms handwriting, by someone with knowlege of his work and receint $118 thousand dollar work bonus check.
Who comes to kidnap a girl and THEN stops to write a note on the way out?
Well..., as soon as they find whose DNA ended up inside her panties and long johns, then they’ll have a chance to ask more questions...
As it said — “The unexplained third-party DNA on the clothing of the victim is very significant and powerful evidence,” Lacy said. “It is very unlikely that there would be an innocent explanation for DNA found at three different locations on two separate items of clothing worn by the victim at the time of her murder.”
—
It would seem that the way the Ramseys would be involved, by this information, is if they invited some guy in to molest their daughter (I suppose that would be an explanation). And then they tried to coverup for him...
And..., of course, they’re still covering up for him now... :-) I do know that with the imaginative minds we have at Free Republic, we can certainly come up with a score of conspiracy theories...
My theory is this: a pediophile broke into the house earlier in the evening while the family was out. while he waited he wrote the ransom note. Hid when the family came home. waited till they were asleep and then snagged jon bonet.
Now, because it showed in autopsy that she ate pineapple before she died and the parents swear they never gave her any, I think jon bonet either KNEW the perp(which would also explain the 118K ransom) or he was dressed as santa claus...this would be why jon bonet never put up a fuss.
I don’t think he inteded to kill her but she must have given him trouble and he killed her, then escaped. He’d have to be pretty damned experienced to leave behind little to no DNA.