That's a bold statement which you can't make in an absolute sense considering the way in which Linda Arndt and the Boulder police allowed the crime scene to be contaminated and the numerous shortcomings of the Boulder authorities concerning chain of custody, lack of experience in homicide investigations, rejecting of help offered by DPD, etc. Ever consider that JonBenet could have been molested by someone wearing a latex glove using an inanimate object? DNA wouldn't have been left by her father, brother or mother but she still would have been a victim of molestation and incest.
From reading your other posts in this thread you need to learn quite a bit more about the case before you make such definitive statements. By the way, do you know who Tom Haney is?
“Ever consider that JonBenet could have been molested by someone wearing a latex glove using an inanimate object?”
Anything is possible, except that there was dna in the crotch of her underwear that did not match them.
I understand what you are saying about the crime scene, but I’m having a hard time believing anyone but the molester is going to have their dna in the crotch of the undies.
Have they said what the source of dna is?
Are we talking skin cells?
Or was it semen?
“From reading your other posts in this thread you need to learn quite a bit more about the case before you make such definitive statements.”
That’s probably true. And from what I’m reading from others is that alot of people are making definitive statements about guilt without definitive proof.
I don’t know who Tom Haney is.
One other reason I found the thread interesting - we watched the move The Zodiac the other night (rented it from netflix).
At the end of the movie I was wondering how accurate handwriting analysis really is.
Any freeper opinions about that would be appreciated too.
I was convinced of Patty’s guilt in the beginning - but then again, I thought Richard Jewell was guilty too.
Then I thought the first anthrax scientist was guilty too.
By the time they pointed at the second guy I was skeptical, and now I’m pretty skeptical about claims of absolute guilt especially when you’ve got this dna thing.
So now I’m considering the possibility that a woman was branded a killer and died with that -and maybe she was not the killer.