[DevNet]

You still haven’t called out those from your side for violating the social norms that you called me out for violating.

And these personal attacks - what is with the liberal “debating” tactics from your side?

And why should I explain it? I wasn’t the one who said “His molecules have limited potential because all molecules have limited potential. Indeed, certain ribonucleotides that are linked together to make RNA cannot form naturally in solutions.”

[GodGunsGuts]

==And why should I explain it? I wasn’t the one who said “His molecules have limited potential because all molecules have limited potential. Indeed, certain ribonucleotides that are linked together to make RNA cannot form naturally in solutions.”

What the author is clearly saying is that RNA cannot form outside of living organisms without intelligent intervention by scientists (who btw are created in God’s image).

[metmom]

“Even after they are carefully formed, they are very fragile. Just add water, oxygen, or light, and all the “evolutionary progress” of these molecules is destroyed.”

Water and O2 exist in the human body, yes?

Yes, water and O2 exist in the human body. What about it in relation to RNA being destroyed by O2 and H2O ?

[CottShop]

Dev- very simply- the scientists were acting just like the metainfo in a body- they were controlling, manipulating, designing and protecting their creation in the test tube to get the results they were after- RNA would NEVER do all that on it’s own- they had to create a designer RNA to get it to do what they wanted it to do. A beaker is a much much different environment than a species system which has ALL the metainfo already inplace to do what they did in the testube- and ALL without any outside help