Posted on 01/17/2009 3:04:35 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
I expose liberals with equality on FR. You're a special (retread) case?
You're being coy and dishonest. In answer to your non sequitur I pointed out that the human body consists of more than just fluids.
In contrast, you fled my question. Twice.
[crickets]
99% of the chemical reactions in the human body require a liquid solution for the reaction to take place. Pointing out that the body consist of more than fluids doesn’t have anything to do with chemical reactions - you are trying to cloud the system.
Now provide an example of a reaction that doesn’t - you won’t because doing so is very difficult.
You still haven’t called out those from your side for violating the social norms that you called me out for violating.
And these personal attacks - what is with the liberal “debating” tactics from your side?
And why should I explain it? I wasn’t the one who said “His molecules have limited potential because all molecules have limited potential. Indeed, certain ribonucleotides that are linked together to make RNA cannot form naturally in solutions.”
A soulless accidental beaker of fluid, without purpose to some.
No source, naturally. And nothing to show that such reactions could all take place in vitro and outside a body.
Now, here's the question you've fled three times in a row:
Why isn't all medical research simply done in vitro?I'm predicting you'll fail to answer again.
Reductionists are willfully blind to the complexity of life.
==And why should I explain it? I wasn’t the one who said “His molecules have limited potential because all molecules have limited potential. Indeed, certain ribonucleotides that are linked together to make RNA cannot form naturally in solutions.”
What the author is clearly saying is that RNA cannot form outside of living organisms without intelligent intervention by scientists (who btw are created in God’s image).
“...what non-respiratory chemical reactions in the human body do not require a liquid solution...?
Why exempt respiratory reactions? Oxygen transport from the lungs requires a liquid medium - blood. Btw, not all liquid media in the body are solutions - red and white cells in the blood are not “in solution”.
Yep. Those darn prokaryotes started this mess, and then passed it on to the eukaryotes.
“Now if you will excuse me I have a Core i7 system to design.”
Maybe you could let it just evolve...:)
'Cause medical researchers can't breath under water.
Water and O2 exist in the human body, yes?
Yes, water and O2 exist in the human body. What about it in relation to RNA being destroyed by O2 and H2O ?
Amazing! Over in the corner is a big glass vessel with electricity forming a dark goo. That’s Dad.
On the table is a beaker of cloudy solution. That’s their Son.
Who says a person can’t choose their relatives?
[[The conditions (to include the RNA) that made the experiment possible were intelligently designed.]]
Dontchaknow? No matter how intelligently designed, how manipulated, how carefully controlled, how carefully directed, IF somethign folds, it’s a ‘marvelous example of evolution’ and a “Glowing success”
Whatastupidjoke, nice bit of misdirection!
No, his 'question' was either ignorance, or deliberate misdirection, like yours.
Metmom 'answered' it quite well. Nucleotides do not just form in a solution; they form only within a living cell. Always have - always will.
You believe all kinds of dogs micro-evolved from an original pair on the Ark, right? Would you say that the people who made a Labradoodle proved that foxes could not have developed naturally because you have to start with a specified breed?
False!
They are reactions that can only happen within the specific electromagnetic field that results from the life that God created, within a living cell; no place else.
That is the fact that you are running from.
Dev- very simply- the scientists were acting just like the metainfo in a body- they were controlling, manipulating, designing and protecting their creation in the test tube to get the results they were after- RNA would NEVER do all that on it’s own- they had to create a designer RNA to get it to do what they wanted it to do. A beaker is a much much different environment than a species system which has ALL the metainfo already inplace to do what they did in the testube- and ALL without any outside help
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.