Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pessimist

“Where was his veto pen?”

Dear Pessimist:

That is a very good question. I, too, wish in retrospect that he could have taken a harder line. But could he? As Bismark’s cliche says, politics is the art of the possible. My own guess is that Bush woke up every morning during that time, got his intelligence briefing, and after crapping in his pants decided that nothing mattered but the war. I think Bush’s adversaries and even more sadly Bush’s friends exploited that.

Maybe I’m wrong in that hypothesis, and I suppose that we’ll only really know many years from now. But I also think it is very easy for you to look back with perfect hindsight at that time and assert that he could have just gotten out his pen and by writing his name made everything all right.

I am on record in these postings and elsewhere conceding various mistakes that Bush made. Bush himself has been forthcoming. To my way of thinking, at breathtakingly low cost he has kicked the sh*t out of the bad guys, to an extent that will only become clear in years to come; and he did it over the opposition of his own party. I love him for that, and I am willing to forgive many mistakes, including the completely inconsequential ones such as Harriet Meiers.

I wish his fellow party members had defended him more vigorously on Guantanamo Bay, on Katrina, on Valerie Plame, and a host of other tempests in teapots. Where were they? I find their silence inexcusable and self-defeating.

And I would ask you what I asked someone else in this thread: Who is it that you want to lead this party and carry the conservative mantle? If Bush is so bad, who is superior?


24 posted on 01/17/2009 8:39:36 AM PST by drellberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: drellberg
after crapping in his pants

If , he did not have the back bone for the job he should have resigned..

28 posted on 01/17/2009 8:43:44 AM PST by org.whodat (Conservatives don't vote for Bailouts for Super-Rich Bankers! Republicans do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: drellberg

While it may be true that “politics is the art of the possible”, leadership is something else again.

As for your narrative regarding Bush’s motivations: I think you’re far to generous. I wonder though if your generosity isn’t really directed toward yourself for having supported him. Think about it. No doubt well meaning Clinton suporters had a lot of experience doing the same.

As to who I want to lead “this party”. What party is that? I no longer consider myself a republican. Party aside though, I really haven’t seen anyone that enthuses me right now.

Anything wrong with that?


32 posted on 01/17/2009 9:02:00 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson