Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HardStarboard

CRA gave breaks to the poor or minority groups. What makes the government hypocritical is they are shocked that many of these victim groups are defaulting on their loans. CRA did not apply to nonvictim groups. You and I are suppose to meet debt ratios and enter accurate info on the application. Example if you earn 45000 a year and you put down 60000 as your income, that is fraud even if the bank does not verify it. I dare you to do that on a loan application and use that as an excuse in front of a judge when you are caught. Better yet, show me in the CRA regs that encourages an applicant on a conventional loan to falsely enter his/her income/asset. On the other hand if you enter 45000 and the bank gave you a loan that requires a minimum income of 60000, then you as the borrower is off the hook legally. The bank commits fraud by putting your loan into a portfolio and tells the investor that all the loans data are verified and the loans were givened to solid borrowers backed by real property. There is a civil law suit against WaMu where the mortgage originators are now the star witnesses against the bank. Read about it and you will see that the borrowers committed fraud and the mortgage originators under pressure from the immediate supervisors encouraged fraud. The government is not going to prosecute because they need the banks to cooperate during the bailout, but fraud was committed by borrower and bankers. It is common knowledge amongst real estate agents, builders, bank staff and mortgage staff that false entry and collusion is common, and there is grounds for the feds or state to audit the loans originated by banks that fail miserably. There are also state laws that govern bank practices, and based on what I read about the WaMu case, many of these regs were violated and the borrower/lenders can be criminally liable.


34 posted on 01/19/2009 9:16:39 PM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Fee
I'm not sure we have an argument that there was illegal collusion between applicants, mortgage companies and some banks. Banks were scared of the CRA - it imposed severe penalties if loans were not proportioned out to lower income groups based on local demographics. Acorn and Rainbow Push both used the CRA as a hammer to bludgeon banks into making loans their normal underwriting standards would have run away from.

Just happened to read this today. While it doesn't address the CRA issue and sub-prime mess by name, as usual, Thomas Sowell capsulizes things in a few well chosen words. He pretty much says it all:

Lured To Disaster
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2167865/posts

36 posted on 01/20/2009 3:56:27 PM PST by HardStarboard ("The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule - Mencken knew Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson