You said — “I haven’t read your post, but I think I’ll take the admin moderator’s offer up and hit the abuse button & call you out as a troll, which is basically what I’ve been doing on that other thread. So I’ll hit the abuse button and see what kind of exchange is required to prove that you fit the definition of troll as stated on this thread.”
Ummm..., a troll when you didn’t read my post at ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2165967/posts?page=155#155
I would think that one should read it first before determining whether it was “trollish”... LOL...
I posted already that I’m not going to read your posts, so if they have something of substance, another freeper is going to have to direct my attention to it.
But I’ll be happy to read every word of your posts once again, if the admin mod needs that to establish a case that you’re a troll. The very first sentence of the definition talks about “specious arguments” and you’ve got that part down in spades.