To: mtg
"What always astonished me about the Miller experiment is the idea of simulating lightning (which produces millions and millions and millions of volts of electricity in just one or two seconds) by applying a small amount of continuous voltage over a period of five days." I don't think you could prove, by a laboratory experiment, that a bolt of lightning could start a forest fire. But we know that it happens.
35 posted on
01/16/2009 3:57:26 PM PST by
NicknamedBob
(If you translate Pi into base 43 notation, it will contain this statement.)
To: NicknamedBob
I don't think you could prove, by a laboratory experiment, that a bolt of lightning could start a forest fire. But we know that it happens. Silly man. Laboratory experiments are intelligently designed. They can't possibly tell you anything about what happens in nature.
Besides, lightening isn't random. It's guided by Thor, or someone like that.
36 posted on
01/16/2009 4:00:58 PM PST by
js1138
To: NicknamedBob
I don't think you could prove, by a laboratory experiment, that a bolt of lightning could start a forest fire. But we know that it happens. Actually, when a bolt of lightning does start a forest fire, the forest becomes the laboratory. So your statement makes little, if any, sense.
39 posted on
01/17/2009 9:06:31 AM PST by
mtg
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson