Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace

>>Its not just the left... I’m not thrilled about wiretapping citizens without warrants except in some extraordinary time sensitive situations.


Without listening to the wiretaps, how would you know you have an extraordinary time sensitive situation on your hands? <<

If you use that logic, you can justify any search - why warrants to search homes or persons or even cavities - you might find something time sensitive?


10 posted on 01/15/2009 10:07:47 AM PST by gondramB (Preach the Gospel at all times, and when necessary, use words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: gondramB

I was responding to your logic which was, and is, faulty.

Look, these things have already been hashed out. Time of war, communications involving enemy parties outside the U. S., intelligence officers monitor communications and discover terrorism plans that require immediate action. Waiting for a warrant would delay any action beyond the time of the planned terrorism.

Yet, your opinion was that we shouldn’t be allowed to wiretap UNLESS we have an extraordinary time sensitive situation, which means, the situation cannot wait for a warrant.

But if we’re not allowed to wiretap without a warrant, then we would not know about those time sensitive plans until AFTER the terrorists have put the plans into action.

With that in mind, just how does your plan work to protect us? Or are you only concerned with picking up the bodies later?


14 posted on 01/15/2009 10:17:37 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson