Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Polybius
The girls exploited themselves. And then the boys they shared the images with exploited the images. They are under the age of consent. Therefore they are prohibited from consenting to such activity. They do not realize the gravity of their actions.

Perhaps when they appear in court and a panel of 12 strangers plus a judge and their parents view the images, they will realize that they did have a transgression and a lapse in judgement.

There were minors who stripped and engaged in sex on camera for the "Girls Gone Wild" bottomfeeder (who is a free man).

I guess we just have to accept that is the culture today, right? If they want to do it (consent), let them? Who are we to judge.

107 posted on 01/15/2009 11:06:05 AM PST by weegee (Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: weegee
The girls exploited themselves.

Oh, yes, "The girls exploited themselves".

So you, the Holier Than Thou Moral Police, are all in favor of prosecuting the girls for "child pornography" so that the "evidence" of the case can be passed around the office by the adult D.A. and all of his adult assistants so that they can get their perverted jollies looking at naked teenaged girls while, at the same time, sanctimoniously claim that they are protecting the same child whose naked photo they are passing around to each other.

Any D.A. with a shred of common sense and common decency would have had the photos destroyed without ever looking at them and had the parents deal with the discipline of their own children.

There most certainly is child abuse in this case and it is being committed by certain adults.

Perhaps when they appear in court and a panel of 12 strangers plus a judge and their parents view the images, they will realize that they did have a transgression and a lapse in judgment.

Thank you for proving my point.

The girls "exploited themselves" so your sanctimonious solution is to parade their naked photos in front of 12 adult strangers.

But, why limit it to 12 members of the jury, the Judge and the entire D.A.'s office. Why not advocate that the naked photos be posted on a web page so that millions of other sanctimonious adults can look at them ...... for their own moral good, of course. Such a web page will REALLY make them "realize that they did have a transgression and a lapse in judgment".

Maybe, to keep the run of the mill perverts out, the web page can be password protected so that only card carrying members of the Holier Than Thou Moral Police are allowed to log on and view their naked bodies and then talk about how shameful those girls were.

114 posted on 01/15/2009 1:47:02 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson