Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel
I suppose if neither side had done anything, Iran might have turned out like Egypt.

That’s not a great option either.

The west would kill for a leader like Mosaddeq today. Too bad the US wanted to suck up to the British and French in the 50's. Another amusing piece of hindsight: Ho Chi Minh asked to be an independent US proxy after WWII. We gave it back to the French. Fools.
6 posted on 01/14/2009 8:48:19 PM PST by ketsu (ItÂ’s not a campaign. ItÂ’s a taxpayer-funded farewell tour.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ketsu

Because the French were involved, it was difficult, especially with DeGaulle right after the war and into the Fifties.

Times were certainly different. I suspect Ho would have turned out no different whether a US proxy or not, but we’ll never know.


7 posted on 01/14/2009 9:38:55 PM PST by rlmorel ("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: ketsu

And by the way, Mosaddeq was a socialist, and was probably closer to being a dictator communist than he was to being a typical beaurocrat.

I am not a big fan of anti-imperialism simply for the sake of being anti-imperial. As Dinesh Desouza said in his book “What’s So Great About America”, being a victim of imperialism was not a bad thing in many cases for India.


9 posted on 01/14/2009 9:45:13 PM PST by rlmorel ("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson