Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dragnet2; subterfuge
If this corrupt government had one ounce of responsibility they'd cancel this public parade and inauguration for Obama, due to an economic emergency, and conduct it in a secured environment, indoors, while televising it to the country.

Yeah, great idea. Cancel the public inauguration ceremony for the first time in US history, when the inauguree just happens to be the first non-white President in US history, and millions of Americans are eager to watch the inauguration in person. The bill to deal with the ensuing riots and property damage would make the $160 million look like pocket change. And the long-term bill to deal with the political fallout would make the bill for the riots and property damage look like pocket change.

The reason that the bill is so high is that many more people are reasonably expected to attend than have ever attended any previous inauguration. The people are voting with their feet, and the government is responding accordingly. Have you taken a peek at the federal budget lately? This $160 million is not only just a drop from the obscenely humongous bucket, but is also a lot better spent than many of the much bigger-ticket items. It alarms me how easily so many conservatives allow themselves to be distracted by this sort of thing.

66 posted on 01/14/2009 10:29:16 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: GovernmentShrinker
The reason that the bill is so high is that many more people are reasonably expected to attend than have ever attended any previous inauguration.

Unless Obama cancels the event, the Inauguration is going to happen, and it is going to attract a very large crowd.

Pres. Bush is doing the right thing to make sure that Federal and DC officials have the resources necessary for the logistics and security of a million+ people (twice the population of DC, BTW) coming to the event.

70 posted on 01/14/2009 10:45:34 AM PST by Citizen Blade ("A Conservative Government is an organized hypocrisy" -Benjamin Disraeli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker; dragnet2

If you can’t see this coronation for what it is I can’t help you.


75 posted on 01/14/2009 1:39:13 PM PST by subterfuge (BUILD MORE NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS NOW!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker
The big bill is for big security, and it’s needed.

Bullsh*t!

The economy is cartwheeling down range out of control, millions have lost their homes, investments, businesses, and jobs...And this monster government is going to spend hundreds of millions on a GD ceremony?

If this corrupt government had one ounce of responsibility they'd cancel this public parade and inauguration for Obama, due to an economic emergency, and conduct it in a secured environment, indoors, while televising it to the country. Period. No more wasting tax payer money that does not exist in the first place.

This is outrageous. Stop the excuses.

This is just another example of out of control, irresponsible, corrupt government driving this country to the brink.

Yeah, great idea. Cancel the public inauguration ceremony for the first time in US history, when the inauguree just happens to be the first non-white President in US history

You're making more excuses on the backs of the tax payers.

More people will view this through television than in public.

In addition, what comes first, the economic well being of our country, or a government ceremony that cost hundreds of millions that we don't have?

As I mentioned above, this government ceremony that will cost tax payers tens of millions could easily be held in a large, secured building, accommodating thousands, and be televised to the entire nation. This would save tens of millions in tax payer dollars.

You use the moniker, "GovernmentShrinker". I would suggest you change your screen name asap.

77 posted on 01/14/2009 2:41:19 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: GovernmentShrinker

In addition, if the GD government is so extremely concerned with security, it would appear what was stated post # 77 would be even more appropriate.


80 posted on 01/14/2009 2:47:20 PM PST by dragnet2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson