Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sudetenland

“it precludes the federal government from removing or in any significant way abridging that inherent right.”

I agree, which is precisely why I do not consider it within the state’s authority to grant rights.


181 posted on 01/16/2009 9:34:12 AM PST by CSM (IÂ’m jubilant! Now that the Dems are completely in charge, we can FINALLY blame THEM for everything!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]


To: CSM

Yet they do. They require you to have a license etc. etc. If they can do all of the things that I have previously listed, how is banning the use of cell phones any different? In every case, they are placing constraints on the “right” to drive.


182 posted on 01/16/2009 10:36:49 AM PST by Sudetenland (Those diplomats serve best, who serve as cannon fodder to protect our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson