To: Sopater
Well, an 18-y/o is an adult. It’s smarmy and disgusting and inappropriate in a school setting, but not criminal.
5 posted on
01/13/2009 4:02:38 PM PST by
Not A Snowbird
(Go, Sonics! And take the Seahawks with you.)
To: SandyInSeattle
It should be criminal. After all school teachers are jack booted state thugs who must be constantly monitored by the courts lest they proselytize all the Jewish kids to the Baptist church. Why would we allow such untrustworthy people to seek sexual congress with the students?!(/s)
9 posted on
01/13/2009 4:05:39 PM PST by
muawiyah
To: SandyInSeattle
Well, an 18-y/o is an adult. Its smarmy and disgusting and inappropriate in a school setting, but not criminal.
Well, do we really need to tout headlines that list the things smarmy and disgusting and inappropriate things that teachers can do without bringing criminal charges? They should at least be fired and have their licenses revoked. Teaching just isn't for them.
11 posted on
01/13/2009 4:07:15 PM PST by
Sopater
(I'm so sick of atheists shoving their religion in my face.)
To: SandyInSeattle
It’s all about power. That’s why some states instituted laws that protect even 18-year-old students from teachers who have authority over them and don’t have their students’ best interests in mind.
13 posted on
01/13/2009 4:07:48 PM PST by
goldi
To: SandyInSeattle
It is still wrong if she was a student of his. That means every college professor now can relive the 60’s!
33 posted on
01/13/2009 4:54:08 PM PST by
cameraeye
(It only just begun. Are we losing yet?)
To: SandyInSeattle
If the 18 yr old was enticed into sex by their boss at work, is that criminal? Or are the teachers/employers just civilly liable?
To: SandyInSeattle
Well, an 18-y/o is an adult.
And they can be policemen (in many places)
And they can join the military
But they can’t drink.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson