Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Court: Teachers Can Have Sex With 18-Year-Old Students
Fox News ^ | Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Posted on 01/13/2009 3:59:22 PM PST by Sopater

SEATTLE — Washington state law does not bar teachers from having sex with 18-year-old students.

That's the decision of a three-judge panel of the Washington Court of Appeals, which on Tuesday ordered the dismissal of a case brought against Hoquiam High School's former choir teacher.

The teacher, Matthew Hirschfelder, was charged with first-degree sexual misconduct with a minor. He challenged a judge's refusal to dismiss his case. The appeals court unanimously agreed that the state law is vague, and that the Legislature only intended to forbid sexual contact between school employees and students who are 16 or 17.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; ageofconsentlaws; culturewar; homeschool; naughtyteacherlist; publicschool; sexpositiveagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last
To: hunter112
I agree that teachers having sex with students is wrong. I can't believe I actually have to say that. The teacher should no doubt be fired.

But all the supreme court did in this case was decide that in the case of a willing 18 year old student, it's not criminal.

81 posted on 01/14/2009 4:56:30 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000; Sopater

Those who don’t know would be amazed at the rules teachers had to adhere to in the old days—in many instances, they could be fired just for getting married—let alone for having extramarital sex, let alone with a student!


82 posted on 01/14/2009 5:15:05 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
They brought the water in from the well, kept the fire stoked and swept the floor.

They often lived in the homes of their students' parents, and they'd better not be seen with an MAAAAAN!

83 posted on 01/14/2009 5:19:23 PM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: goldi

/bingo


84 posted on 01/14/2009 6:39:11 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: bannie

Exactly!


85 posted on 01/14/2009 8:04:03 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

It was criminal (teacher student relations), it was not a case of statutory rape. The same would hold if she had been 16.

The way the law was written identified it as being with a “minor”. Age of consent being 16, the age of majority there is 16.

“18=adult” had nothing to do with the decision.


86 posted on 01/15/2009 8:56:31 AM PST by weegee (Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: bannie

And the tradition continues, female gym teachers are never seen with a man.


87 posted on 01/15/2009 8:57:31 AM PST by weegee (Beware the Green Menace, the socialists warning you of global warming under your bed are hysteric.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: PurpleMan

So? Just becuase 18 is the age for some things doesn’t mean it should be for all things.


88 posted on 01/15/2009 3:17:55 PM PST by RightMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RightMike

It’s the legal age of majority where they should by fully emancipated, not haphazardly.


89 posted on 01/15/2009 3:38:23 PM PST by PurpleMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: weegee

HAHAHAHA! The most feminine woman in our high school is a PE teacher...but, otherwise, you’re right!


90 posted on 01/15/2009 5:55:47 PM PST by bannie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson