Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kickass Conservative

HAHA...

What I think is funny is that the guy that proposed the bill “Bobby Rush” would not be allowed to even posess a CHL in Oregon (where I live) because he is a convicted felon!!!

Only in America can a Black Panther/ Convicted Felon write new gun laws... WOW


175 posted on 02/02/2009 8:45:51 PM PST by GlockG19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: GlockG19

I’m as skeptical as anyone about the liberals’ intentions, but did anyone bother to read this bill? It applies to the following:

`(i) any handgun; or
`(ii) any semiautomatic firearm that can accept any detachable ammunition feeding device; and
`(B) does not include any antique.’.

I think it’s unconstitutional no matter what, but it is not applicable to all weapons. It applies to all handguns and any semi-auto that uses a clip. And it does not include antiques (clearly) as the article implied.

There are plenty of rifles and shotguns in this country that do not use clips, so why does everyone automatically assume it’s a grab for all guns?


176 posted on 02/12/2009 9:15:35 PM PST by scarecrowhunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

To: GlockG19

Still reading. Section 301 seems to do away with private sales of any firearm (did he mean qualifying firearm?) unless it’s done thru a dealer to do a background check.

Interesting. I will certainly be writing to my congressman.


177 posted on 02/12/2009 9:15:36 PM PST by scarecrowhunter (universal background checks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson