This sounds interesting, files I suppose are more stringently backed up and with more secure copies since its been found our enemies wish to deploy ESM devices to try and cripple us electronically.
I firmly believe the record of Obamas passport is being reviewed in a certain chamber at this very minute.
All of the evidence cannot remove Obama from the office because of the football field size of dominoes that will collapse if he is pulled out right now, so I am betting the gameplan is to let him act out as POTUS, there will be no mention of this to the public, Obama will just be an actor until a convenient time that he can either be removed without causing riots and panic or his term expires.
There are powers that can do this, for all intents and purposes everyone will see him in position as POTUS, he will be registered as President but behind the scenes more prudent and legal minds will lead America.
Very few dominoes, but the threats of violence will now be ratcheted up by the Axelrod operatives. The existence of the INS port of entry doc from 1961 will light their fuse. But this guy is not more important than our Constitutional contract being abrogated by a affirmative action fraud.
For what it’s worth, I posted this locally elsewhere topic being concervative media unwillingness to address issues....
To: Nokia; laweeks; MHGinTN; pissant; Kevmo
Ref.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2163242/posts
33 posted on Monday, January 12, 2009 9:42:00 PM by laweeks
The only explanation I’ve heard for the conserv pundits to ignore this issue is that they have come to recognize that
certain events had to take place in order to hold BO to rights.
No efforts to put this issue forth prior to the election got any traction.
And pushing the issue was against the “kid glove” republican approach to this election.
[this is much more a condemnation of the RNC and McCain than it is the conserv media in that said media was given nothing to work with. The evidence was not well digested at this point. And very few wanted the tin hat label without some cover (or at least acknowledgement) by the RNC/conservative leaders]
After the election, realize the following had to take place in order to establish plaintiffs (those hurt) and defendants(BO et al)...
- The electors have to certify BO and Plugs. In spite of efforts to educate, the electors as a group, blindly accepted the tainted evidence of eligibility.
- The congress had to certify the elector votes. Again, in spite of efforts to recruit honorable reps and sens to legitimately question, NO HONORABLE REPS OR SENS WERE FOUND!
This is probably the most disturbing logical conclusion.
Meanwhile several lawsuits were brought, denied, rejected, appealed and BO’s phantom position was represented in at least some by expensive law firms. And many rightly question why this tactic would be taken rather than simply producing a $10.00 document.
Still no food for the conservative pundits to hang on at this point.
Now....
We have multiple cases before the supreme court in various stages and with various dates of consideration.
Each case has some merit - if you have followed this issue. But none contend that they have solid evidence of wrongdoing. All require the production of back documentation of BO’s legitimacy (cause NO ONE knows who this clown really is!!!)
Getting the documentation “right now” doesn’t disqualify BO simply because there must be a court debate about both the evidence and the constitutional presidential requirements.
However, BO knows there are constitutional issues involved(he claims expertise in this area) and realizes that he could be forced to produce documentation at some point.
So, BO can...
1. Withdraw now under some silly excuse.
2. Release everything and hope for the best.
3. Persist, be sworn in, and hope for no exposure - ever.
4. Persist, be sworn in, and perjure himself.
And there are a couple of other possibilities....
1. All discovered documentation is complete, valid,
and completely aboveboard.
2. All discovered documentation has been swept clean
and cannot be exposed for years or ever.
Judge Roberts is forcing the issue.
He will swear in Obama on Jan. 20. Why not?
He knows, as do the other justices, the issues and the ramifications - but not necessarily all the facts.
He knows that Obama’s inauguration will either be valid or perjured.
If, upon consideration of the cases filed and to be filed, Obama is “clean”, all has been done properly under the constitution.
If, any filed cases should cause the release of information that causes eligibility to be REJECTED, Obama has committed perjury and BO as POTUS is invalid.
If Obama has committed perjury/fraud, his standing is invalid and, in essence, he never
became president. Some submit that certain circumstances would result in his expulsion as an illegal alien – but that is dependant on documentation not yet available.
If Obama has not committed perjury, then his fraud can continue just subject to random
citizen cases claiming he was never eligible in the first place.
BIG NOTE…
Obama only commits perjury if he accepts the oath of office from Judge Roberts!
(provided of course that he is indeed the fraud that many rightly contend)
Therefore, it is a good thing to hail the inauguration and wish well blah, blah, blah.
And enjoy the precise mechanizations of the Supreme Court aka Judge Roberts.
TO THE ORIGINAL QUESTION….
“Where are they? They could be in line for a bail out. Fox is supposedly being bought (partially) by the Saudis “
That still doesn’t answer why there’s been a total conservative blackout both on the radio, tv, and newsprint . . . After all, Ann Coulter (and I love her dearly) is supposedly a Constitutional lawyer . . . why NO COMMENT WHATSOEVER anywhere, anyplace, at any time.
All the other controversial crap about Obama was thrashed so thoroughly these past couple years, but NOTHING ABOUT THIS! NOTHING! Apparently, Rush, Levin, and Hannity (et al) are screening ALL CALLS to eliminate anything about this attack on our constitution. I don’t get it!
Sounds like it should be a SLAM DUNK! Do they know something that we don’t?
33 posted on Monday, January 12, 2009 9:42:00 PM by laweeks
Bottom line is that Rush/Hannity/Beck and others don’t do investigative journalism. Their business is fronting known facts and issues to their audience – plus commentary.
As some would say…
They got no ammo in their magazines.
It’s kinda unfair to blame them for the lack of facts surrounding
Barack’s tremendous farce.
The Supreme Court is fixin’ to load those mags.
It will then be up to our favorite commentators to
lock, load,
aim, and fire.
Have faith.
Like my Dad told me….
“they always get theirs in the end”
Kinda simple but (in my experience) true.
36 posted on Tuesday, January 13, 2009 1:27:57 AM by bossmechanic (If all else fails, hit it with a hammer)
My current point being that most of the evidence is there but it only matters inasmuch as the Supreme Court deals with it.