I agree they are following the letter of the law. And for something like this they better. Clarence Thomas has all the information regarding this case, and has circulated it amongst the rest. Every single one of them knows all the issues. Berg supposedly has taped evidence from Obama’s mother, stating he was born in Kenya.
This is a procedural error on Berg’s part, in a rush for justice. I hope I don’t eat my words when Berg’s finally makes it back to the SCOTUS. Obama will already be in by then.
Supposedly. According to Berg's affidavits the interview with her was conducted in a language that she doesn't speak and in an ancestoral village she's never lived in. So it could be that Berg's writ was turned down because of Rule 10: "A petition for a writ of certiorari is rarely granted when the asserted error consists of erroneous factual findings or the misapplication of a properly stated rule of law."