To: dascallie; David; Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
It looks like, to my untrained eye, that they want to gather more information, and not actually do anything until they’ve decided the case. (?)
2 posted on
01/12/2009 8:05:50 AM PST by
null and void
(Hey 0bama, now that you've caught the car, what are you going to do with it, hmmm?)
To: null and void
It looks like, to my untrained eye, that they want to gather more information, and not actually do anything until they’ve decided the case. They let Anderson file his amicus brief in support of Berg's case. Then they denied Berg's petition. That's it in a nutshell. Berg is attempting to sidestep the appeals process. The Supreme Court said no.
To: null and void
Thank you for the ping, null and void...I don’t unerstand a word of it, though.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson