Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dascallie

long time lurking atty here. Thought I’d register and answer.

What happened is that an Amicus Brief was already filed along with the motion to accept the filing. They did permit him to file it and then denied Cert. The reason they did that was to discourage the filer of the Amicus brief from filing another suit with the same arguments. In short, they just refused to hear the case and this particular one is over.

Hope that helped.


14 posted on 01/12/2009 8:19:29 AM PST by karibdes (It's not a perfect world. Screws fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: karibdes

It’s so difficult to believe the Supreme Court is punting on this one. It seems to me it’s the straw that will break the Constitution’s back.

Thank you - I’m glad you registered. I don’t particularly like your message, but it does make sense.


17 posted on 01/12/2009 8:27:16 AM PST by Helen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: karibdes
Thought I’d register and answer.

Awww...how nice. </sarcasm>

22 posted on 01/12/2009 8:37:09 AM PST by TankerKC (Lately I miss the Y2K kooks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: karibdes

long time lurking atty here.
***Of all the cases filed with the SCOTUS, how many have had 2 forwarded conferences? That strikes me as very rare. Is it completely unique?

Also, I know that 99.5% of cases don’t get writ of cert, but what percentage of cases get forwarded for conference? I’ve asked around and only gotten silence on that question.


42 posted on 01/12/2009 12:19:50 PM PST by Kevmo ( It's all over for this Country as a Constitutional Republic. ~Leo Donofrio, 12/14/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson