I would hasten to add that Williams is positing that the autopioetic structure of ALL LIFE is beyond the reach of naturalistic explanations, and that ID is the ONLY acceptable historical inference with respect to the laws of cause and effect. So far, I haven’t met a single evolutionist who can falsify this claim, let alone come up with a better explanation than ID.
[[I would hasten to add that Williams is positing that the autopioetic structure of ALL LIFE is beyond the reach of naturalistic explanations, and that ID is the ONLY acceptable historical inference with respect to the laws of cause and effect.]]
BUT let’s be clear here that the article ALSO shows the why both statements are correct, and that it’s not just assumptions, but evidences and verifiable expriments backign htese statements up. I do htough think the article should include a part 3 showing more evidnece to back these claims up- showing thta nature is not capable of hte chemical purity and megainfo creation needed at every step of a supposed megaevolutionary model- but even htese 2 articles establish I think very reasonable laws, and also establish the unreasonableness of naturalistic causes.