Maybe Truth isn’t what Evolution “Science” is about, but it’s what the real science seeks. If your claims aren’t about what is true, than they are false!
“2 Pet 2:1 [NIV] But there were also false prophets among the people, just as there will be false teachers among you. They will secretly introduce destructive heresies, even denying the sovereign Lord who bought them—bringing swift destruction on themselves.
2 Pet 2:2 [NIV] Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute.
2 Pet 2:3 [NIV] In their greed these teachers will exploit you with stories they have made up. Their condemnation has long been hanging over them, and their destruction has not been sleeping.”
God will clean house in good time.
Read the definition I posted, and read for content this time.
It does not say that the opposite of true is false; it says truth can defined in many ways, often loosely, and is best not used in physics (and I added, in science).
A scientific theory is not proclaimed as truth, Truth, or TRVTH. It is proclaimed as the current best explanation for a given set of facts. That is why, when new facts arise, a theory can be modified or even partially discarded--because it was never proclaimed as truth, Truth, or even TRVTH.
But this does not make it false, and to claim such is to engage in sophomoric word play.