Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom

Are you suggesting it is difficult to use the methods of science to prove or disprove intervention by a supernatural agent?


821 posted on 01/15/2009 7:57:19 PM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 820 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

[[Are you suggesting it is difficult to use the methods of science to prove or disprove intervention by a supernatural agent?]]

I wouldn’t suggest that- Any forensic scientist can infer intelligent agents- and given hte right evidence, can even determine the necessity of the supernatural IF there is both enough evidence to show natural causes aren’t sufficient, and if enough evidnece shows enough clues that supernatural causes were involved.


823 posted on 01/15/2009 8:05:13 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies ]

To: js1138

It’s equally difficult to use those methods to prove or disprove a naturalistic, non-supernatural agent.

The amount of difficulty involved in proving or disproving a supernatural agent does not imply a materialistic naturalism by default.


827 posted on 01/15/2009 8:19:35 PM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 821 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson