That would be because he is more concerned with facts on the ground than with mental masturbation.
There's lots of productive research along these lines. Chemists aren't much interested in counting the reasons something can't be done.
[[That would be because he is more concerned with facts on the ground]]
Correction- He’s more concerned with throwing God otu of the equation by inferring Nature-did-it than he is about looking at hte actual scientific facts that refute what he hypothesises
[[There’s lots of productive research along these lines.]]
Really? And they are comign up with? Nothing but assumptions that violate laws.
[[Chemists aren’t much interested in counting the reasons something can’t be done.]]
Apparently- too bad- objective science demands these be taken into concideration- infact ceded to when it becoems clear that it can’t be done.
Chemists aren’t much interested in counting the reasons something can’t be done.
Speaking for all chemists again are you?