Yes, I’ve read it. I own a copy. I recommend it before you continue looking silly by asserting these problems are new or haven’t been addressed by biochemists.
The book I linked to is a simplified version of a more technical publication. I doubt if it can be made simpler.
I just have one general question. Where will you move the goalposts when these technical problems are solved through research?
Uhhh speaking of moving goal posts are you going to explain why you need all kinds of steps to understand ID theory, while big bang theory gets a free pass?
If only you would devote more time to answering questions and not incessantly asking them!
[[I just have one general question. Where will you move the goalposts when these technical problems are solved through research?]]
I have fuill confidence the goalposts aren’t going anywhere JS- Evolution is biologically impossible- can’t say it much clearer than that- All the evidence coming forward just keeps showing just how impossible when looked at objectively, and not with a ‘it could have happened’ attitude that ignores the evidences- the goalposts are clearly within view, and we sir are not the ones that keep moving htem- We simply follow the evidneces-
[[The book I linked to is a simplified version of a more technical publication. I doubt if it can be made simpler.]]
Well- good news for me then- does it have lots of pictures?
[[Yes, I’ve read it. I own a copy. I recommend it before you continue looking silly by asserting these problems are new or haven’t been addressed by biochemists.]]
The ‘problem’ of metainfo’ has ‘been addressed’? Really? Mind givign a brief sysnopsis informing us all how biochemists have refuted the idea of metainfo being IC or specially created?