[[The requirements of this irreducible complexity thoery seem to be that any change in the form will render the organism unsurvivable. ]]
No sir that isn’t true- IC is designed to handle change- Yuo are tryign to assert that nothign in IC can change, and if it does, it renders IC unreasonable- this is NOT the case- IC does NOT have to include ONLY IC components- but hte components that ARE IC can not be reduced
[[Every species is already “irreducibly complex” as it exists.]]
no it isn’t- no they aren’t- They CAN be reuduced i nthe REDUCIBLE parts and systems, however, they can NOT be reduced in the IC parts and systems- Miller in his testimony knew this full well, but he too tried, and succeeded unfortunately for honestly intellectual scientific practicioners, to convince the activist judge that his argument abotu IC was correct- it was not-
And yet it seems to be submitted that within any given species there can be none that would be consistent with evolutionary mechanism.