[[Any evidence then, that life was created?]]
Yes- there is evidence life was created- the very article listed by GGG is evidence
[[The author seems to be presupposing that there is a cause and effect the assumption being that a creator is the cause and life is the effect. ]]
Please keep the discussion about hte article and not about Who God is- you are deviating from the article’s claims
[[Let me take the liberty of simplifying the authors argument. The “effect” (existence or anything) has to have a cause. Therefore “existence” (effect) proves a “creator” (cause).]]
It is showing evidnece for IC, and it is statign that naturalism is incapable of creating htis IC in a stepwise manner- This article is attemptign to establish a ‘law’, not create an arguemtn for cause and effect proving God.
The "evidence" from the article is that existence proves a creator, it doesn't.
The author seems to be presupposing that there is a cause and effect the assumption being that a creator is the cause and life is the effect.
Please keep the discussion about hte article and not about Who God is- you are deviating from the article’s claims
Maybe you should read the article.
It is showing evidnece for IC, and it is statign that naturalism is incapable of creating htis IC in a stepwise manner- This article is attemptign to establish a ‘law’, not create an arguemtn for cause and effect proving God.
First you must support and provide evidence, with no contradictions before you can have a "law."