Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CottShop
there’s nothign wrong with hte method- the method is fine- and I’ve championed the idea that we should return to it- fully- and objectively.

Then I don't understand your objections to scientists trying to find an explanation of the fossil record as the result of natural processes.

No need to change anythign regardign hte method- or replace it with anything- ID works fully within the parameters of the method

So do other theories that don't agree with ID, or the particular theories you've presented.

644 posted on 01/14/2009 4:04:13 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 633 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

[[Then I don’t understand your objections to scientists trying to find an explanation of the fossil record as the result of natural processes.]]

Not sure why you’re stuck on this issue? I never said that I object

[[So do other theories that don’t agree with ID, or the particular theories you’ve presented.]]

I’m not really aware of any other plausible theories? It would seem that a naturalistic theory is really the only alternative?


691 posted on 01/14/2009 8:52:35 AM PST by CottShop (uite imite weallite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson