[tpanther]

The scientific method, as currently accepted and practiced doesn't address anything but naturalistic causes and origins. If you want to submit that the scientific method is flawed and needs revised or replaced with something else, we can discuss that but I think it off topic for this thread.

I don't see how the big bang theory, or the string theory or multverse theory as "currently accepted and practiced" are necessarily naturalistic, not at all.

When hot air cult apostles are out purposefully placing thermometers too close to jet engine exhausts at airports to collect data to support manmade global warming, it's plainly evident to see that scientific conclusions are not somehow immune to politics, ideology and somehow are always ultimately objective, via the so-called "peer review" process.

[CottShop]

[[When hot air cult apostles are out purposefully placing thermometers too close to jet engine exhausts at airports to collect data to support manmade global warming, it’s plainly evident to see that scientific conclusions are not somehow immune to politics, ideology and somehow are always ultimately objective, via the so-called “peer review” process.]]

I did a report on that very topic on my website- Seems they also place the temp probes in paved parking lots, on rooftops next to airconditioner motors etc- Some dude caught them in the act all over the US and took pictures too- I even sent the info to Senator Inhoffe who heads up the anti ‘man-caused’ global warming website for use in congress-

[tacticalogic]

When hot air cult apostles are out purposefully placing thermometers too close to jet engine exhausts at airports to collect data to support manmade global warming, it's plainly evident to see that scientific conclusions are not somehow immune to politics, ideology and somehow are always ultimately objective, via the so-called "peer review" process.

Is that really a valid conclusion? Do we know whether that "research" was ever peer reviewed at all?

[tacticalogic]

When hot air cult apostles are out purposefully placing thermometers too close to jet engine exhausts at airports to collect data to support manmade global warming, it's plainly evident to see that scientific conclusions are not somehow immune to politics, ideology and somehow are always ultimately objective, via the so-called "peer review" process.

Then if we're going to stay on topic we need to look at how politics and/or ideology may be interfering with the objectivity of the research and conclusions of this theory.