To: js1138
You don't know what its function is, so it must certainly be junk? Nay not so. A review of so-called vestigial organs will easily expose the error of that idea.
Think of what you call junk DNA as being like all the components in your computer, you don't know what all of them do, but the person who designed the machine did, and they serve their purpose.
You do understand the principle?
620 posted on
01/13/2009 6:48:48 PM PST by
count-your-change
(You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
To: count-your-change
Did I ping you to #614. Good stuff there re: “junk” DNA, and the mind-boggling complexity of our genome. It just keeps getting worse and worse for neo-Darwinism...and at an accelerating rate!
To: count-your-change
You do understand the principle?How about this principle:
Humans share with mammals about a thousand genes for the sense of smell. But in humans, a third are inactive.
So humans have the gene responsible for the joy dogs experience while butt snuffing, and humans can give it a pass.
But hey, if the need arises, the Designer has foreseen it.
657 posted on
01/14/2009 5:57:12 AM PST by
js1138
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson