[tpanther]

Are you claiming that Intellegent Design isn't a religious theory? Then can you provide any evidence at all that supports it?

It baffles me to no end you're still asking for "evidence that supports it", when throughout this thread evidence is all around you.

I think the question for many of us now is: "How can one NOT see the evidence"!

[LeGrande]

It baffles me to no end you're still asking for "evidence that supports it", when throughout this thread evidence is all around you.

I think the question for many of us now is: "How can one NOT see the evidence"!

An argument is not evidence. Logic is based on assumptions. Assumptions not based on facts (evidence) are worthless. Logic based on worthless assumptions are worthless.

But it gets worse : ) Even if the assumptions are correct and logic is properly applied, the conclusions may not be correct. In the end, evidence rules supreme : )

Where is the evidence (not the arguments) that supports ID?